You've created a world. The "people" there, human or not, don't live
like we do. How do you go about writing their lives - their manners,
their rules, etc. - without sounding either pedantic or overblown? It's
not as easy as it looks, but I hope this checklist will help you to get a
good start.
1. Identify social and cultural parameters
Some of you may already have done this, i.e. listed out the social
rules by which the people of your world live. If you have not, it's
worth doing. This single step in itself can be a long process, as there
are a lot of areas in which cultural parameters operate. I'll list some
of the areas, just to give you some inspiration. Greetings and manners,
architecture, food culture (preparation and consumption), economic roles
(work), taboo behaviors (verbal, physical), education, elites
(economic, educational, etc), religion, folklore, etc., etc.
There's a lot out there, and if your world is comprehensive enough, it
will be enough for your story to get lost in. To make sure that doesn't
happen, make sure to...
2. Organize and prioritize your parameters
Of all the possible cultural parameters you might have come up with,
not every one is going to be equally important to your story when you
write it. Is there a particular cultural artifact, or set of
assumptions, behaviors, or practices that are going to be central to
your main conflict? Are any assumptions going to take a back seat, but
still be important to themes of the work? It's a good idea to have a
list, or at least a clear sense in your head as you start, what these
parameters are going to be. Culture is so huge and complex that focus is really important.
3. Identify "problematic" parameters
The extreme version of a problematic social or cultural parameter is
one that will be difficult for readers to accept. Perhaps they'd say
something like, "I just can't believe that people would not want privacy
here." Problematic parameters are the ones that don't fall easily into a
set of existing real-world expectations. Either something is normal
that shouldn't be, or something that we consider normal is abnormal.
4. Develop a multi-pronged strategy for how you as author will disseminate cultural knowledge
There are several ways to "get social and cultural information across." Use them all. If you use just one, I guarantee it will come off as weird, so try to balance the ways you get things across. Ask yourself:
a. which information will be evident in the setting?
For example, architecture says a lot about the history of a people. The
presence of both classical stone buildings and apartment blocks of
ultralight concrete implies a long history of technological development
as well as respect for the legacy of the past.
b. which information will be integral to character behavior and judgment?
Manners and politeness will show up in dialogue and character judgments.
It will show up in where the person goes, and how (where do they access
transportation, for example?). It will show up in whether they notice
"that person isn't where they should be," or "that person's clothes
really mean he's showing off," etc.
c. which information will be taught?
Teaching should not be done by the author to the reader (unless you have
an explicitly storytelling/teaching narrator). If something needs to be
taught, it should show up in a natural teaching context within the
society: teacher to student, adult to child, or insider to outsider,
etc. There may be fixed methods (curriculum) by which such teaching is
accomplished. I have a caste whose members, when in doubt, recite
lessons to themselves. I don't do this with everyone, but it fits with
the educational style of this particular caste group.
In each of these cases, the question of normal and abnormal is
absolutely critical - normal and abnormal as defined by the
point-of-view character(s). Any cultural detail that you explicitly
describe will come across as "marked," or not entirely normal. If it's
stuff that your people actually consider to be unusual, then fine. If
it's stuff they consider normal, then you have a problem.
5. Make sure that the normal is defined by lack of attention, rather than attention.
To define something by lack of attention, you have to deliberately
redirect attention onto something else. That something else can be a conflict between characters that causes them to say things to one another that they already know. It can be a "secondary detail,"
or some related characteristic within the normal parameter that has
particular meaning - such as a hairstyle on a dark-haired head, if
everyone has dark hair. It can be avoidance behaviors - say, when
people of a lower class deliberately avoid particular types of
interaction with members of a higher class in order to avoid
unpleasantness.
Note: I constantly - and I mean constantly - see abuse and
discrimination of oppressed groups indicated by direct insults or by
direct conflict between the groups. Try to avoid this unless the
presence of this conflict is the inciting event of your story for some
reason. Oppressed people go very, very far out of their way to avoid
conflict of this nature. You will be doing yourself a huge favor if you
show the possibility of this conflict in avoidance behaviors and the
characters' internal fears, and only show direct conflict in emergency
situations. Because this stuff only happens when the people concerned are unable to avoid it.
6. Remember to defeat real-world expectations deliberately.
We have all kinds of "sets" that naturally go together in our
expectations. "If there's a TV, there must be a phone" is one example.
"If people are having intimate relations outside of an existing
monogamous relationship, that must be bad," is another. The one I run
into is, "If there are nobles living in a caste system, it has to be
medieval." As author, you have to defuse these contexts deliberately.
Show the different path technology took in your world. Or have
characters casually discussing what would be taboo behavior for us. Or
make sure to put electric lights on the first page just to say to the
reader, "This is not medieval! SEE?" Just leaving it in the background
is not enough, because our expectations are very, very strong. Maybe
you've seen that internet meme with the message where only the first and
last letters of each word are in the correct places, and everything in
the middle is mixed up? And you can still read it? That is because the
strength of your previous knowledge and expectations will be enough to
build the word just on the basis of first and last letter (and maybe a
hint of middle content). Believe me, only one or two details will cause
an entire set of technologies, or morals, etc. to come into play. If
you don't want them in play, you have to slap them down on purpose, as
early as possible.
I could go into greater detail, but I hope this gives you a basic
framework to work from. Good luck with creating your fictional
societies!
How has no one commented on this yet?! I especially like 4c. I was batting around the idea of having a well-traveled, scholarly type narrator for my world, but I steered away from that because I didn't want it to seem like a "wandering classroom" where the reader feels like a student that wants to be anywhere else but stuck in the day's lesson.
ReplyDeleteSomething that immediately came to mind is different cultures' table manners. Some eat with utensils of a very specific order, size, placement, etc. Some eat with "simple" chopsticks. Some eat with their hands. How clean are they? What is considered rude vs acceptable flaunting of the rules.
For instance, I could say dwarves mostly eat with their hands, tearing loaves of bread, picking up a steak with their hand and ripping into it, stabbing a hot potato with their dirk, etc. Elves on the other hand are meticulous about NOT touching their food and placing dainty bites in their mouth. They savor silently while dwarves chew open-mouthed and belching and mmmm and pick their teeth with daggers. Lots of easy comparisons. How much does it turn expectations on their head to reverse all of the above?
I agree with you on the disadvantages of an over-knowledgeable narrator. It's kind of fun to learn with them, anyway! I'd say that switching away from expected table manners could be fun, but could also be distracting. Depends on context (doesn't everything?). Thanks for the comment!
Delete